Fault Dilation
Initial Set-up and Settings
The Fault Dilation Tool will only work once there is an established connection with Getech Globe and an active map. The latter needs to be in the WGS 1984 coordinate system (WKID 4326) for the tool to work.
Connect to Globe
On first use of the Fault Dilation Tool, there will be a brief message stating “Doing first time set-up - please wait…”, this will disappear soon and the ‘1:1 M Structures for Fault Dilation Tool’ layer will be loaded into your map.
Fault Dilation Tool and Settings
The Fault Dilation Tool has four main sections: 1) the faults and related settings, 2) the stresses and related settings, 3) the area of interest, and 4) output location.
The 1:1 M Structures for the Fault Dilation Tool are automatically loaded into your active map, please select these structures using the drop-down menu, the fault description and fault category fields should then automatically populate.
The two key fields in the structure feature class that the tool uses are (1) description and (2) category. The description field has key terms which describe the kinematics of the structure, for example, strike-slip, thrust, normal, reverse or undefined, whilst the category is referring to the fault categories. Within Getech’s 1:1 M Structures, each fault is assigned a letter between A and D to represent its category, with A being large, crustal-scale faults, down to D which are lineaments with unknown kinematics. All fields in Section 1 are automatically populated if you are using the Getech’s default structural database. However, if using your own data, please ensure that there are equivalent fields in your feature class, otherwise the tool will fail. We recommend adding two new fields which follow Getech’s legend (see Table 1 Getech Legend for Structures in the Appendix) and Getech’s fault categories (Figure 1 in the Appendix).
View/Edit Fault Scoring Parameters
Expand the drop-down menu to see further options for the View/Edit Fault Scoring Parameters.
The first option is the ‘Max Fault Segment Length’. This refers to the maximum fault segmentation distance for which each of the fault dilation tendencies will be calculated. Please bear in mind that the vertices of the structural polylines can be a controlling factor. Due to the way most structures are digitised, the segments are likely to be unequal in distance. Therefore, the fault segments may also be varied, with the shortest segment defined by the distance between two vertices in the structural data set, and the largest segment defined by the ‘Max Fault Segment Length’ value. The default setting is 0.1 decimal degrees. Note that reducing this number will increase the processing time of the tool.
The Fault Category Scores (weights) use Getech’s category of size of fault with (A-D as described above). Default values are based on the relative size of the faults as larger faults generally have wider fault damage zones than smaller ones. These values can easily be modified directly in the score table if required.
If the data being used do not have the full set of categories, then the table will only show what is relevant.
The Fault Regime Scores (weights) follow the averages as defined in the World Fault Permeability Database (Scibek, 2020); however, it is possible to change from the default values if you so wish. As with the categories, only regimes that are found within your data will be listed here.
The default stress data comes from the World Stress Map (Heidbach et al., 2016), however, if you wish to use alternative stress indicators, then please click on the folder icon; the stress data needs to be in a .csv format with a schema similar to that of Heidbach et al (2016).
View/Edit Default Stress Search Parameters
This is the maximum radius that is used to search for stress data; the default for the tool is 200 km. If no stress data are encountered within this radius, the tool will fail. The search radius can be manually increased, but please note that results will be based on far-field stress data that are not necessarily representative of the Present Day stress field within the AOI.
As described in Section 2.2, the stress search algorithm evaluates the standard deviation of maximum horizontal stress indicators that are encountered within the search radius defined above. The search is limited to data for which this standard deviation reaches a maximum threshold; this threshold is defined in the ‘Maximum SHmax Azimuth Standard Deviation’ parameter field. By default, the tool uses a value of 25°, but the user can manually adjust this value (up to 180°) to include a broader range of azimuths in the calculation of average SHmax within the AOI.
The tool applies distance-weighting to encountered stress data within the search radius; this weighting is used in the calculation of Present Day average maximum compressive stress at each fault segment. By default, inverse distance weighting is used (i.e. weights are scaled by the inverse of distance from fault segments; this method may be manually changed to ‘linear’ or ‘none’ in the ‘Distance Weighting Method’ parameter field.
The application of distance-weighting starts at a specified distance from each fault segment. Stress data encountered within this distance radius are considered to be wholly representative of the stress field for that fault segment, so are not weighted. By default, tool uses a distance threshold of 0.1°, but this may be modified in the ‘Relative Distance Weighting Start’ parameter field.
The stress search algorithm used by the tool includes all stress indicator methods by default, where methods are recorded in the World Stress Map compilation. The ‘Exclude Stress Methods’ parameter field allows the user to exclude specific stress indicator method data from the fault dilation analysis. Method abbreviations are shown in the parameter field; a full name and description of the stress indicator methods is provided in the Appendix (Table 2 Stress Indicator Types).
Apply Stress Quality weights
These are the default settings for the stress quality weights and can be easily modified if required.
Apply Stress Method Weights
All stress indicator method weights can be modified from the default if desired (see Appendix Table 2 Stress Indicator Types).
Exclude Plate Boundary Stress Measurements
This box can be checked to exclude the regional tectonic influence of plate boundaries and adjacent tectonic plates. If checked, then a further stipulation can be made, which removes any stress data from the search algorithm within a specified distance of any plate boundaries.
If you have a pre-defined AOI polygon feature class then please add this using the folder icon. Alternatively, a custom AOI may be drawn directly onto the map using the pen icon; this will start an edit session.
If drawing your AOI, then a dialogue box will open, please click yes.
Once you have drawn the AOI, it will appear as a red polygon and the associated feature class is then automatically saved to your default geodatabase.
Result spacing refers to the distribution of points (and therefore raster grid size) for the fault damage score. The default spacing is 0.1° by default.
All outputs are automatically saved to the default geodatabase of an active ArcGIS Pro session. If you would like to use a different location, then click on the ‘folder’ icon. We do not recommend changing locations whilst in the middle of an ArcGIS Pro session, or a saved project (in which the tool has already been run), as it will not automatically add the new layers (due to output versioning).
For information on the rationale for making the Fault Dilation Tool, methodology, and interpreting results, please refer to the Fault Dilation Toll User Guide located in the Guides and Reports button on the Getech Ribbon.
Appendix
Getech Legend for Structures
The following table is populated using the description of Getech structures. If populating your own data sets for the Fault Dilation Tool, then please use either (A), (B), (C), or (D) before the type of fault. For example, a ‘B’ category ‘normal fault’ will become ‘(B) Active Normal Fault’.
| Legend Description |
|---|
| Active Normal Fault |
| Active Normal Fault Reactivated as Reverse Fault |
| Active Thrust Fault |
| Active Toe Thrust Fault |
| Active Reverse Fault Reactivated as Normal Fault |
| Active Left-Lateral Transtensional Fault |
| Active Right-Lateral Transtensional Fault |
| Active Undifferentiated Strike-Slip Fault |
| Active Left-Lateral Strike-Slip Fault |
| Active Right-Lateral Strike-Slip Fault |
| Active Left-Lateral Transpressional Fault |
| Active Right-Lateral Transpressional Fault |
| Active Undifferentiated Fault |
| Active Lineament |
| Active Oblique Subduction: Undifferentiated |
| Active Spreading Ridge |
| Active Subduction Zone |
| Active Transform Fault |
| Active Basement Arch |
| Active Antiform/Anticline |
| Inactive Suture Zone |
| Active Plunging Antiform/Anticline |
| Active Double Plunging Antiform/Anticline |
| Active Overturned Anticline and Syncline |
| Active High Angle Reverse Fault |
| Active Low Angle Normal Fault |
| Active Synform/Syncline |
| Active Plunging Synform/Syncline |
| Active Undifferentiated Fold |
| Inactive Normal Fault |
| Inactive Normal Fault Reactivated as Reverse Fault |
| Inactive Thrust Fault |
| Inactive Toe Thrust Fault |
| Inactive Reverse Fault Reactivated as Normal Fault |
| Inactive Left-Lateral Transtensional Fault |
| Inactive Right-Lateral Transtensional Fault |
| Inactive Undifferentiated Strike-Slip Fault |
| Inactive Left-Lateral Strike-Slip Fault |
| Inactive Right-Lateral Strike-Slip Fault |
| Inactive Left-Lateral Transpressional Fault |
| Inactive Right-Lateral Transpressional Fault |
| Inactive Undifferentiated Fault |
| Inactive Lineament |
| Inactive Oblique Subduction: Undifferentiated |
| Inactive Spreading Ridge |
| Inactive Subduction Zone |
| Primary Fracture Zone: Inactive Transform Fault Certain |
| Secondary Fracture Zone: Inactive Transform Fault Certain |
| Inactive Basement Arch |
| Inactive Antiform/Anticline |
| Inactive Plunging Antiform/Anticline |
| Inactive Double Plunging Antiform/Anticline |
| Inactive Overturned Anticline and Syncline |
| Inactive High Angle Reverse Fault |
| Inactive Low Angle Normal Fault |
| Inactive Synform/Syncline |
| Inactive Plunging Synform/Syncline |
| Inactive Undifferentiated Fold |
| Primary Fracture Zone: Inactive Transform Fault Inferred |
| Secondary Fracture Zone: Inactive Transform Fault Inferred |
Table 1 Getech’s legend descriptions for structures. Please note that a category needs adding to the beginning in brackets.
Stress Indicator Types
| Stress Measuring Types | Abbreviation |
|---|---|
| Borehole Breakouts (BO) Analysis of individual breakouts |
BO |
| Analysis or cross-sectional shape of entire well | BOC |
| Televiewer-imaged shapes of individual breakouts | BOT |
| Borehole Borehole slotter |
BS |
| Drilling Induced Drilling-induced tensile fractures of the borehole wall |
DIF |
| Drilling-induced petal centreline fracture | PC |
| Earthquake Focal Mechanisms (FM) Average of p-axis or composite focal mechanism solutions |
FMA |
| Formal inversion of several focal mechanisms | FMF |
| Single focal mechanism solution | FMS |
| Geological Fault -slip Data (GF) Inversion of fault-slip data observed on planes of a variety of trends |
GFI |
| Paleo-focal mechanism, P-axis measured at 30° to fault in plane of slip vector | GFM |
| Orientation from fault attitude and primary sense of offset | GFS |
| Hydraulic Fracturing Measurement (HF) No magnitude information |
HF |
| Magnitude reported as gradient | HFG |
| Magnitude reported for maximum depth | HFM |
| Testing of pre-existing fractures (HTPF technique) or stress magnitudes from inversion of tests over a depth interval | HFP |
| Shear Wave Shear Wave Splitting in Boreholes |
SWB |
| Shear Wave Splitting in Laboratory | SWL |
| Shear Wave Splitting in Seismology | SWS |
| Overcoring Overcoring, or other strain relief measurement |
OC |
| Geological Geological-volcanic vent alignment |
GVA |
Table 2. Modified table from Heidbach et al., (2016) which explains the abbreviations for the stress indicator methods
References
- Heidbach, Oliver; Rajabi, Mojtaba; Reiter, Karsten; Ziegler, Moritz; WSM Team (2016): World Stress Map Database Release 2016. V. 1.1. GFZ Data Services. https://doi.org/10.5880/WSM.2016.001
- Scibek, J. (2020). Multidisciplinary database of permeability of fault zones and surrounding protolith rocks at world-wide sites. Scientific Data, 7(1), 95.